IMF Warns Stablecoins Resemble Money Market Funds and Could Face Run Risks

 

By Ashish Sood // April 11, 2026 @ 12:35 PM Make AlphaWire Logo preferred on Google News
IMF Warns Stablecoins Resemble Money Market Funds and Could Face Run Risks

Share

Points of Focus

  • IMF says stablecoins act like money market funds without safeguards.
  • Tokenization could speed up and worsen financial crises.
  • Risks are limited now, but could turn systemic near $1T market size.

 

 

The stablecoin market has grown to roughly $317 billion in market value. The IMF is now warning that it structurally resembles a money market fund, but without the regulatory architecture that typically governs one. 

In an April 2026 note, IMF Financial Counselor Tobias Adrian draws this comparison directly. He notes that stablecoins may function smoothly under normal conditions, but they remain vulnerable to confidence-driven runs when reserves come under pressure. Even fully backed stablecoins carry structural risk. Par convertibility depends not only on reserve quality, but also on an issuer’s ability to honor redemptions and on the depth and liquidity of underlying Treasury and repo markets.

 

 

 

Tokenization removes the buffers regulators rely on

Traditional finance is designed with built-in friction. End-of-day settlement, batch processing, and delayed reconciliation give regulators time to intervene, offset exposures, mobilize liquidity, and manage defaults before settlement is final.

Tokenization removes these buffers. Settlement becomes continuous, margin calls are automated, and liquidity demands emerge in real time. In a 24/7, cross-border system operating at machine speed, crises can escalate faster than central banks can respond. Existing emergency tools, built for business-day cycles, may not extend effectively to always-on tokenized infrastructure.

 

Register and unlock all content immediately

Create a free account to get full access to all our content.

 

 

A five-pillar framework – with wholesale CBDC at its core

Adrian’s proposed policy roadmap rests on five pillars. These include anchoring systemically important tokenized settlement in safe assets, with wholesale CBDCs identified as the public sector’s preferred anchor.

The framework also calls for consistent regulation across equivalent financial activities, legal certainty around tokenized asset ownership and settlement finality, improved interoperability standards, and updates to central bank tools for 24/7 automated systems.

Without such anchors, the IMF outlines a more adverse scenario, becoming the default: private stablecoins dominate tokenized settlement, public backstops weaken, and crisis management tools lose effectiveness. In this environment, stablecoins without access to central bank reserves would require higher liquidity buffers and more conservative margining to offset structural risks.

 

 

Washington contradicts IMF’s proposed fix amid Treasury liquidity risks

The IMF’s wCBDC recommendation faces a direct US legislative contradiction. 

The GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, established a stablecoin framework centered on US Treasuries rather than CBDCs. In the same month, H.R. 1919 passed in the House, seeking to bar the Federal Reserve from developing or issuing any CBDC.

 

 

Furthermore, the IMF acknowledges that par convertibility depends on Treasury market liquidity. However, this reliance introduces its own risks. For example, Tether held $135 billion in Treasuries as of Q3 2025, meaning large-scale redemptions could trigger the liquidation of the same assets backing reserves.

That said, Treasury markets remain deep, with over $1 trillion in daily transactions in 2025. Stablecoins account for roughly 3% of outstanding T-bills, manageable for now, though stress risks could grow with scale. The systemic threshold is widely seen at around $1 trillion in market size. Standard Chartered analysts Geoffrey Kendrick and John Davies reportedly put that milestone at end-2028, projecting $2 trillion in total stablecoin market cap by then. In short, risks remain structural today, but may become systemic if stablecoins scale toward the trillion-dollar mark.

Share

Ashish Sood

Ashish is a seasoned Web3 and crypto writer passionate about simplifying the world of digital assets for everyday readers. Combining his coding background with a commerce degree, he brings a unique perspective to his work. Ashish strongly believes in blockchain’s potential to democratize the global financial system and drive meaningful social and political change across the world.

Table of content

Ad

Related Articles