Share
The Bank of England (BoE) walked back its most controversial stablecoin proposal on May 19, replacing proposed individual holding limits with a framework built around aggregate issuance controls.
Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden, speaking at the CityWeek 2026 conference in London, told attendees the bank was now evaluating “temporary guardrails on the total amount of stablecoins issued” as an alternative to the per-wallet caps that had drawn sustained criticism from the UK crypto industry since the original consultation closed.
England is going crypto!
The Bank of England is about to drop stablecoin rules next month.
Final framework lands by end of 2026.
They want stablecoins, tokenized deposits and a digital pound all working together.
Industry pushed back hard on the original draft.
They called… pic.twitter.com/8VDXwymvCI
— Kyle Chassé 🐸 (@Kylechasse) May 20, 2026
The earlier framework, published by the BoE in 2025, had proposed capping individual sterling stablecoin holdings at 20,000 pounds ($26,786) and business holdings at 10 million pounds for coins widely used in everyday payments. Industry groups called them the most punitive stablecoin restrictions proposed by any major jurisdiction.
The Cryptoasset Business Council said it would drive GBP stablecoin issuance offshore. Coinbase’s UK policy head called the original holding limits “a cap on innovation.” The BoE heard the feedback and, on May 19, began publicly retreating from it.
The bank’s financial stability concern has not changed. What changed is its preferred mechanism for managing it.
The risk Breeden has consistently articulated is deposit flight. If households and businesses shift savings out of bank accounts and into stablecoins at scale, particularly during periods of market stress, the commercial banking system could face a liquidity squeeze that weakens lending capacity.
The 20,000-pound holding cap was designed to limit how much any individual could move, functioning as a direct brake on that flow. The proposal drew criticism not because it addressed the wrong risk but because it addressed it at the wrong level, restricting every user regardless of whether systemic stress was occurring.
An issuance cap operates differently. Rather than limiting individual wallets, it limits the total volume of sterling stablecoins in circulation, allowing the bank to set a systemwide threshold beyond which new issuance is paused. The approach “could achieve the same aim at lower cost to the sector and allow a wider range of high-value payment use cases, including for corporates,” Breeden stated to Bloomberg.
The mechanics matter for market participants. Under an issuance cap, a corporate treasury can hold any amount of GBP stablecoin up to the systemwide cap without hitting a wallet-level restriction. That distinction is what makes the pivot significant for the large institutional payment use cases the BoE’s original framework effectively blocked: cross-border treasury settlement, corporate foreign exchange, and supply chain finance.
Breeden also confirmed that banks can issue stablecoins directly, provided they do so through a non-deposit-taking subsidiary with distinct branding that can reference the parent institution.
The practical effect: Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, and Standard Chartered can all enter the sterling stablecoin market through a corporate structure that separates the digital token from their deposit-taking operations, while still leveraging the trust and distribution network of the parent brand.
No UK high-street bank has publicly announced a sterling stablecoin program. The regulatory clarity Breeden provided on May 19 removes the primary structural barrier that would have made such an announcement premature. Draft rules arrive in June. Final rules are expected by year-end. A bank-issued GBP stablecoin, backed by a regulated UK institution and operating within a published BoE framework, becomes commercially plausible on a 2027 timeline.
The holding limit pivot is not the only regulatory variable affecting stablecoin issuer viability in the UK.
The BoE’s consultation proposed that UK stablecoin issuers hold a portion of reserves in non-yield-bearing instruments, a requirement the industry argued would make sterling stablecoin issuance structurally less profitable than operating under Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) in the eurozone or the GENIUS Act in the US.
Whether the June draft rules address the reserve yield question alongside the issuance cap framework will determine whether the UK can attract sterling stablecoin issuance or whether issuers choose to fulfill the framework from Dublin or Luxembourg instead.
Katie Harries, head of policy at Coinbase UK, offered the most precise industry response: “The issuance cap may be more workable, depending on where the cap is set, but critically, no other jurisdiction is deeming it necessary to cap innovation in the way the BoE is still considering.”
A high aggregate cap, set at a level unreachable for years under realistic adoption conditions, serves as a non-binding placeholder with no practical effect. A low cap creates the same jurisdictional arbitrage as the 20,000-pound holding limit: Issuers domicile their product in a more permissive jurisdiction and distribute it into the UK through secondary channels.
The risk is not theoretical. MiCA’s euro stablecoin framework drove euro-backed stablecoin monthly transaction volume from $69 million in January 2025 to $777 million by March 2026 while setting reserve and disclosure standards without capping holdings or aggregate issuance. The BoE is watching that data.
Breeden’s closing statement on May 19 carried the most geopolitically significant detail: The BoE will finalize its framework “in line with the US timeline.”
The GENIUS Act, which established the first federal stablecoin framework in the United States, was enacted in June 2025. The CLARITY Act, which establishes commodity classification for digital assets, including USDC (USDC), cleared the Senate Banking Committee on May 14 and is heading toward a full Senate vote.
A UK framework explicitly aligned with US reserve standards and issuance definitions would lay the foundation for a bilateral transatlantic stablecoin regime, enabling a compliant issuer on either side of the Atlantic to operate in both markets without rebuilding its compliance architecture at the border. That outcome was not on the table when the BoE’s original holding limit proposals were published. It is on the table now.
Draft rules arrive in June 2026.
Share
preferred on
