Harmony Plans to Shut Layer-1, Move ONE to Ethereum Weeks After Major Exploit

By Abhinav Tewari // Edited by Dr. Guneet Kaur // September 7, 2026 @ 12:05 PM Make AlphaWire Logo preferred on Google News

Share

GoPlus Challenges THORChain as 101.5 BTC From Bitget Hack Moves Through Protocol

Share

Points of Focus

  • Harmony proposed sunsetting its blockchain entirely to focus on an AI video business.
  • Its compensation math is built around a confirmed August 11 exploit.
  • Multisig wallets, liquidity pools, and onchain apps won’t auto-migrate.

 

 

Harmony proposed sunsetting its layer-1 blockchain entirely and migrating its native ONE token to Ethereum. 

 

 

 

The company is pairing the shutdown with a pivot into what it calls “The Remix Economy for AI Video.”

The proposal’s actual authority remains unresolved. Harmony described it as non-binding and did not specify a final block date. Under Harmony’s published governance rules, elected validators can create proposals, unelected validators vote based on total stake, and passage requires 51% of total stake weight to participate and 66.7% support following a seven-day introduction period and a 14-day vote, a 21-day process in total. 

Harmony has not stated whether this specific proposal will go through that formal process at all. Validators may begin shutting down nodes starting September 10, a date that precedes any confirmed vote outcome, meaning the practical wind-down could proceed regardless of how or whether the governance question gets resolved.

 

Harmony’s exploit compensation math confirms the August 11 date

Harmony’s numbers pin down a detail earlier reporting left vague. The company said its $1.372 million validator compensation pool equals “the network-wide rewards issued during the one year preceding the Aug. 11 incident.”

An attacker exploited a flaw in Harmony’s cross-shard receipt verification system beginning around 23:25 UTC on August 11, a consensus-layer bug rather than a smart contract vulnerability. The flaw let valid cross-shard receipts be processed more than once, crediting attacker-controlled addresses with newly forged ONE tokens with no corresponding debit anywhere else on the network.

Harmony’s incident updates reconciled two figures that initially looked contradictory: a first-wave mint of roughly 4 billion ONE tokens, detected within the exploit’s opening minutes via two empty-block transactions, and a fuller reconstruction showing approximately 3.01 trillion ONE forged in total across six transactions into four exploiter wallets. The larger figure is roughly 200 times Harmony’s entire token supply and carried a nominal value far exceeding ONE’s actual market capitalization at the time, meaning it was never a realizable loss figure in dollar terms.

No user funds were drained from their own holdings. The real damage arrived through the market instead: roughly 2.8 billion of the forged tokens reached attacker-controlled addresses.

As a part of the layer-1 migration,validators may begin shutting down starting Sep. 10 at 7 a.m. Pacific Time, with compensation paid across four quarterly installments to those who sign an agreement, retain their stakes, and serve as governors in the new initiative.

 

Harmony’s math shows a modest AI video revenue ceiling

The pivot’s actual near-term economics look considerably more modest than its thesis suggests. 

Harmony’s posts calculate that using Lightricks’ LTX 2.5 model, released Aug. 11, the same day as the exploit, on Nvidia B200 or GB200 hardware, a single operator generating 10-second clips at full, continuous utilization could produce roughly 1.3 million clips a year, worth $1.7 million in revenue at $0.13 per second. That’s the ceiling at perfect uptime, not a typical outcome, and it sits well below the “10^14 moments” and “billions of fans” language in the same announcement.

Harmony also names its direct competition: Higgsfield generates $700 million in annual revenue, Kling makes $510 million, and Fal makes $400 million. Harmony is entering a market where established players already operate at a scale hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of its stated per-operator ceiling.

 

Multisig wallets and liquidity pools won’t auto-migrate

A real gap sits inside the migration plan itself. Harmony’s snapshot will automatically cover tokens in user wallets, staking delegations, validator rewards, and centralized exchange balances, airdropping new ONE tokens to matching addresses on Ethereum with no claim required. 

Multisig safes, liquidity pools, and onchain smart contract applications are explicitly excluded from that automatic migration. Harmony is urging affected users to exit all smart contracts before Sep. 10, a hard deadline for anyone with funds in DeFi positions or multisig arrangements on the network.

 

What ONE holders actually keep once Harmony’s L1 is gone

Harmony has framed the migration as a clean, no-action-required transition: total token supply and the existing emission rate stay unchanged, and new ONE arrives automatically at the same wallet address on Ethereum. What that framing understates is how much the token itself changes underneath that continuity.

ONE’s original utility was tied directly to a live Layer 1: it paid for transactions across Harmony’s shards, and staking it helped secure that network through validator consensus. Once the L1 is sunset, that function disappears entirely, there’s no chain left to pay fees on or validate. The token becomes a standard Ethereum ERC-20 asset with no base-layer role of its own. Ongoing emissions, instead of rewarding network security, get redirected to fund the AI video initiative, contingent on future governor feedback rather than fixed by protocol rule.

Validators face the same discontinuity. Their original role, producing and validating blocks, ceases to exist once there’s no network left to run. Harmony’s three offered paths, sunsetting a node outright, becoming a “governor,” or converting into an AI video operator or affiliate, all reuse existing ONE stakes as a qualifying credential for entirely different work: governance participation, content generation, or platform moderation, none of which resembles blockchain consensus. 

A holder who takes no action still receives their tokens automatically. What they hold afterward is a claim on an unproven AI content business, not the base asset of an operating blockchain, and that distinction is the more consequential part of this migration than the mechanics of the airdrop itself.

 

Harmony commits to publishing its migration code for audit

Harmony said it will publish the ERC-20 token contract, the governor vault contract, the snapshot calculations, and the airdrop scripts for public audit, a concrete transparency commitment worth noting directly. 

 

 

Total token supply and the existing emission rate will remain unchanged. However, tokens issued through ongoing emissions will now fund the AI video initiative rather than network operations, a real redirection of Harmony’s existing token economics toward an unproven business.

 

What Harmony’s proposal doesn’t specify

The proposal remains non-binding, with no confirmed final block date and no explicit statement on whether it will proceed through Harmony’s validator-led governance process.

Several questions remain open as this proposal stands. Harmony hasn’t said whether it will submit the shutdown to its own validator-led governance vote, or proceed regardless of the outcome. No final block date has been set. And what ONE actually becomes for holders once there’s no Layer 1 behind it, a claim on an unproven AI content business rather than the base asset of a functioning blockchain, is a bigger unresolved question than the proposal itself addresses

Share

Default avatar

Abhinav Tewari

Abhinav is a researcher and author specializing in cryptocurrency, blockchain, and Web3, translating complex protocols into actionable insight for institutions and builders. Drawing on experience across digital marketing, management, and research, he focuses on tokenization, stablecoins and payments, DeFi, and real‑world assets, with rigorous analysis of protocol economics, security, governance, and layer‑2 scalability.

Table of content

Ad

Related Articles