preferred on
Points of Focus
- Trump agreed to 80% of a bipartisan ethics deal before the CLARITY Act vote.
- The Senate votes on cloture for the CLARITY Act on Sep. 15.
- The final text also addresses DeFi developer liability protections lawmakers had disputed.
The Senate is scheduled to vote on cloture for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act at 2:15 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Sept. 15, and the single biggest obstacle to that vote appears to have narrowed overnight.
After a year of intense daily bipartisan negotiations, this bill is ready. Here is the final text. President Trump voluntarily agreed to new ethics provisions holding every federally elected official, judge, and their spouses to some of the toughest ethics restrictions in U.S.…
— Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) September 14, 2026
Senators Cynthia Lummis, John Boozman, and Tim Scott released what they call the bill’s final text on Sep. 14, and President Trump has agreed to roughly 80% of a bipartisan ethics compromise that had kept several Democrats from committing to the bill.
The new language gives state attorneys general a role in enforcing conflict-of-interest rules alongside the Justice Department, addressing a demand Senator Thom Tillis and a group of Democrats made as a condition of their support. It does not, on its own, guarantee the seven Democratic crossover votes Republicans need.
🚨NEWS: Senate Republicans have released new Clarity Act text featuring a revised ethics proposal agreed to by President Trump.
The text also contains changes to the sections on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), stablecoin yield, and the so-called “Ag title.”…
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 14, 2026
What the final CLARITY Act ethics deal actually changes
The sponsors’ release says the final text reflects 126 substantive changes requested by Democrats and includes ethics language reflecting ‘substantially all’ of a proposal negotiated by Tillis and Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego. Under the revised terms, covered federal officials and their spouses would have to divest a ‘significant’ crypto-related financial interest or place it in a blind trust, and state attorneys general could sue an exchange that lists an asset the bill would otherwise bar.
“Democrats got what they wanted; now they need to take yes for an answer,” Lummis said in the release, characterizing a no vote as opposition to ethics reform itself.
White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt made a similar case Sunday night, saying on X that “it’s time to pass this bipartisan bill.”
At every step of the way during the Clarity Act negotiations, the White House and Senate Republicans have been responsive to Democrats’ stated policy objectives.
After more than a year’s worth of negotiations, it’s time to pass this bipartisan bill. https://t.co/kyEYwaKQnA
— Patrick Witt (@patrickjwitt) September 14, 2026
The DeFi and stablecoin provisions still worth watching
The final text also edits the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) to shield software developers from money transmission registration requirements and establish a civil safe harbor, addressing a second dispute that had held up earlier drafts. Whether the text also resolves a separate fight over stablecoin yield – the rules governing whether platforms like Coinbase can pay rewards on stablecoin balances – is less clear from the sponsors’ release alone.
The bill does give the Treasury Secretary new authority to act against deposit flight tied to payment stablecoins, which the sponsors describe as a backstop for community banks. Neither Gallego’s nor Tillis’s offices had issued a public reaction to the September 14 text as of this writing, and the Associated Press reported their offices did not immediately return requests for comment when the ethics agreement was first announced.
Industry and law enforcement backing the sponsors are pointing to
Lummis, Boozman, and Scott’s release names BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, Charles Schwab, and SoFi among the financial institutions supporting the bill. It also says the National Sheriffs Association and the Majority County Sheriffs Association, which represent law enforcement covering more than 130 million Americans, have dropped their prior opposition.
That combination, major asset managers alongside law enforcement groups, is the sponsors’ answer to the argument that market structure legislation trades consumer protection for industry convenience.
Why the CLARITY Act matters beyond Tuesday’s cloture vote
The bill would split regulatory jurisdiction over digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the market structure framework the industry has lobbied for since well before the House passed its own version, 294-134, on Jul. 17, 2025. The Senate Banking Committee advanced its companion text 15-9 in May 2026, per the sponsors’ release.
Tuesday’s vote decides only whether the Senate opens debate, not whether the bill becomes law. A failed cloture motion would not kill the CLARITY Act outright, but with the House having already cleared its September calendar, a failure would likely push the bill past the November midterms.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
Share
Most read articles
