OpenAI and Paradigm Unveil EVMbench to Test AI Agents on Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

 

By James Ademuyiwa // February 19, 2026 @ 01:53 PM
OpenAI and Paradigm Unveil EVMbench to Test AI Agents on Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

Share

Points of Focus  

  • OpenAI and Paradigm launch EVMbench for evaluating AI agents’ ability to detect, exploit, and patch EVM vulnerabilities.  
  • Draws from 120 curated high-severity cases across 40 audits, including competition-sourced scenarios.  
  • Provides percentage-based scoring to measure performance in realistic but limited vulnerability contexts.

 

OpenAI and Paradigm introduced EVMbench on February 19, 2026, a benchmark designed to assess AI agents’ capabilities in identifying, exploiting, and patching high-severity vulnerabilities in Ethereum Virtual Machine smart contracts. This launch matters now in the face of rising demand for automated security tools, as recent high-profile exploits continue to drain billions from DeFi protocols and AI agents increasingly show promise in code auditing tasks.

 

 

The tool uses 120 curated vulnerabilities from 40 audits, primarily from open code audit competitions, along with scenarios inspired by Paradigm-backed Tempo blockchain security processes.

These high-severity bugs include common real-world categories such as reentrancy, access control failures, arithmetic overflows/underflows, oracle manipulation, improper authorization, flash loan exploits, and logic errors leading to fund drainage, types that have historically caused the majority of major DeFi losses.

 

How EVMbench functions  

The benchmark assigns a percentage-based score to agents, summing up their effectiveness in auditing contracts, patching issues while maintaining functionality, and exploiting vulnerabilities. It works by presenting agents with vulnerable code samples and evaluating their outputs against predefined criteria for detection accuracy, patch viability, and exploit success.

 

 

EVMbench operates in three modes: detect, patch and exploit. 

  • In Detect, agents audit repositories and are scored on recall against ground-truth vulnerabilities using a model-based judge. In this mode, financial awards are based on historical payouts. 
  • Patch mode requires agents to modify code such that original tests, excluding those relying on vulnerable logic, pass while exploits fail. 
  • As for exploit mode, it connects agents to a local Ethereum Remote Procedure Call endpoint with a funded wallet; grading uses a Rust-based re-execution framework to replay transactions and verify on-chain state changes, such as balance deltas and events.

 

EVMbench runs AI agents inside isolated Ubuntu 24.04 Docker containers pre-loaded with Foundry, feeding them the original audit scope, automated findings, and sponsor hints to closely replicate real-world auditor workflows, while intentionally disabling web access to prevent external lookups or cheating. 

 

 

This setup makes programmatic grading of detection, patching, and exploitation tasks possible by executing the agent’s actions in a local Ethereum environment. It also verifies outcomes through on-chain state changes, balance deltas, and events rather than subjective human review.

Limitations and scope

The developers note that while EVMbench’s vulnerabilities are realistic and high-severity, the benchmark does not capture the full complexity of real-world smart contract security. It focuses on isolated scenarios rather than comprehensive system audits, potentially limiting its representation of production environments.

 

What the partnership brings to the ecosystem 

EVMbench establishes a standardized, quantifiable benchmark for AI agents in smart contract security similar to Hugging Face’s Open LLM Leaderboard but specialized for EVM risks, offering clear comparisons across agents while pointing out gaps in current capabilities. Unlike general-purpose LLM leaderboards or narrower cyber evaluations such as CyBench, EVMbench focuses on end-to-end real-world tasks, detection, patching with functional preservation, and exploit execution.

 

The 120-vulnerability dataset provides some level of nuance over simpler tests, but its curated nature sacrifices breadth for depth, potentially underrepresenting edge cases or chain-specific issues. Looking at the long-term, it could shift security workflows toward hybrid human-AI models. However, success in 2026 would include developing the model further to capture the full realities of smart contract security in the real world.

 

Share

James Ademuyiwa

James Ademuyiwa is a DeFi strategist, educator, and PhD researcher specializing in decentralized finance. With hands-on experience leading blockchain initiatives at major firms and co-founding a successful startup, he brings sharp market insight to digital asset education. He currently lectures on blockchain, digital assets, and the future of finance for global executive education programs, bridging theory and practice in the Web3 landscape.

Latest Podcast

Mar 17 2026 / Length: 36:29
Mar 6 2026 / Length: 46:59
Feb 27 2026 / Length: 23:56
Feb 5 2026 / Length: 55:34
Wise Prize - Pulse by Alphawire

For this week’s episode of Pulse, Aldo…

Jan 26 2026 / Length: 45:05

Ad

Related Articles