Share
Most traders buying altcoins think they’re making a price call. However, in reality, they’re making a dominance call, whether they realize it or not.
For instance, buying SOL because you expect Solana to outperform is ultimately a view that its share of total crypto market capitalization will expand relative to the rest of the market. Buying ETH because you believe the modular stack will reassert its leadership expresses the same underlying thesis. Loading up on mid-caps because a rotation appears imminent is no different. It means you are not simply expecting those assets to rise in dollar terms; you are expecting them to capture a larger share of the crypto market and outperform Bitcoin in the process.
The asset may change, but the underlying exposure remains the same: a view on dominance.
You’re not just buying those tokens that go up in dollar terms. Instead, it is your conviction that their price will increase more than Bitcoin. Those are very different positions with very different risk profiles, and almost nobody in crypto treats them that way.
The sharpest example of this is the first half of 2022. Bitcoin opened the year around $47,600 and closed June at roughly $19,800, a drop of about 58%. Painful enough on its own. But mid caps and DeFi tokens lost 80% to 95% across the same window. Luna collapsed entirely in May and then Celsius froze in June.
Meanwhile, BTC dominance climbed from roughly 39% in January to around 45% to 46% by mid-June, following the Luna implosion. That’s a meaningful gain on the dominance index in five months, during one of the worst stretches crypto has seen.
What that means practically: if you held a basket of mid caps through that period, you lost on two fronts simultaneously. The first was the raw selloff everyone could see. The second was the dominance squeeze, where the same fear that took 58% off Bitcoin took 80% to 95% off your tokens. Your portfolio ended up 20% to 35% behind Bitcoin on top of an already brutal drawdown.
Almost nobody named that second loss for what it was. The blowups got packaged into individual stories about Luna or Celsius, none of which identified the simplest read: Bitcoin went down, alts went down more, and the chart measuring the difference paid the traders on the right side.
From the FTX collapse bottom in November 2022, where dominance sat around 36%, Bitcoin’s share of total crypto market cap climbed almost without interruption. It peaked at roughly 66% in late June 2025, a gain of more than 80% on the dominance index across about 31 months.
Think about what that means given the price backdrop. Bitcoin went from around $16,000 at the FTX low to above $100,000 across the same period. A market that was violently up in dollar terms was redistributing dominance the whole way toward the asset that already had the most.
For traders holding altcoins during those 31 months, the experience was deceptive in a very specific way. Prices rose often enough that nothing appeared fundamentally wrong. Portfolios were in profit. The cycle seemed to be unfolding as expected.
Yet on the chart most traders were not watching, they were steadily losing the dominance battle. There was no dramatic liquidation, no headline-grabbing collapse, and no obvious signal that something had broken. Instead, there was a gradual erosion of relative performance against a benchmark many never thought to track. While their holdings gained in dollar terms, they were quietly surrendering market share to Bitcoin month after month.
Every position carries exposures you did not consciously choose. The only choice you get is whether you measure them.
A long SOL position has two legs:
Until recently there was no clean way to hedge it. You would have needed to short a basket of every other major asset, eating slippage and funding costs on multiple positions, with the result being a rough approximation at best. When hedging an exposure is that expensive and cumbersome, ignoring it becomes the path of least resistance. So most people ignored it.
The result is an asset class where the largest factor exposure sits unhedged, unmeasured, and invisible to most participants. If every equity long position came automatically attached to a hidden short on the S&P 500 and nobody priced it, that would be recognised as a serious structural problem. That is roughly where crypto sits today.
Most relative trades in crypto are dominance trades with different labels attached.
Buying SOL to outperform Bitcoin is effectively a long SOLDOM and short BTCDOM position, whether the trader recognizes it or not. Building a basket of mid-caps to capture an alt season is often the same short-BTCDOM view spread across multiple tokens, even though a more direct trade could express that thesis with greater precision. Meanwhile, moving into stablecoins because the market appears vulnerable is a form of long USDTDOM exposure, typically without carry and with limited upside.
These may look like three different strategies, but they are all variations of the same dominance trade. The problem is that most traders do not size, manage, or hedge them as such. As a result, they often carry dominance exposure they never explicitly intended to take.
The alt drawdowns of the last cycle were not mainly a verdict on individual tokens or ecosystems. They were a verdict on traders who did not know they were holding a dominance book.
The traders who understand this stop being surprised by losses that have no clean dollar explanation. The ones who do not keep writing about alt seasons that never arrived, without noticing they were short the one chart that explained everything.
Every alt position is a dominance trade. The only real decision is whether to run it deliberately.
Disclaimer: This piece represents the author’s opinion and is intended for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article should be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. Crypto markets carry significant risk. Do your own research before making any investments.
Share
preferred on
